Appendix M: Tool for Peer Review of Clinical Teaching
Retrieved from Chism, N. (2007). Peer review of teaching: A sourcebook, 2nd Ed. (pp. 138-139). Bolton, MA: Anker Pub. Co. Inc.
Peer Review of Clinical Teaching
5 = Strongly agree
4 = Agree
3 = Neither agree or disagree
2 = Disagree
1 = Strongly disagree
Professionalism |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrates respect for patients, coworkers and students |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Demonstrates ethical conduct and discusses ethical issues with students |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Exemplifies professionalism |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Demonstrates enthusiasm |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Serves as an appropriate clinical role model |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical Competence |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demonstrates up-to-date clinical skills |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Demonstrates up-to-date knowledge |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Develops an appropriate treatment plan |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interaction with Students |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Establishes rapport |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Encourages all students to participate |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Asks appropriate questions |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Encourages students to defend their opinions |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Elicits opinions before offering a diagnosis |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Provides appropriate feedback |
|
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
1 |
Comments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall evaluation:
Exemplary Excellent Good Fair Poor